<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ITEX (Largest US Barter Co.) Offered $21 Million By Western Sizzlin</title>
	<link>http://barternewsblog.com/2007/12/27/itex-largest-us-barter-co-offered-21-million-by-western-sizzlin/</link>
	<description>Up to date information on what's happening in the barter world.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 07:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Tucker Toronto</title>
		<link>http://barternewsblog.com/2007/12/27/itex-largest-us-barter-co-offered-21-million-by-western-sizzlin/#comment-1637</link>
		<author>Peter Tucker Toronto</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://barternewsblog.com/2007/12/27/itex-largest-us-barter-co-offered-21-million-by-western-sizzlin/#comment-1637</guid>
					<description>Hello Bob more of a question than a comment, wondering why a steak house chain would buy a barter company?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Bob more of a question than a comment, wondering why a steak house chain would buy a barter company?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Meyer</title>
		<link>http://barternewsblog.com/2007/12/27/itex-largest-us-barter-co-offered-21-million-by-western-sizzlin/#comment-1638</link>
		<author>Bob Meyer</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://barternewsblog.com/2007/12/27/itex-largest-us-barter-co-offered-21-million-by-western-sizzlin/#comment-1638</guid>
					<description>Western contends that its holding company structure would allow surplus cash generated (from other subsidiaries &#038; ITEX) to be used in other investments, including the acquisition of other barter companies.
&lt;br /&gt;
Western believes additional cost savings  would be attained by eliminating the redundant "public company" costs and that such savings would translate into a higher value of Western's stock (greater market capitalization).
&lt;br /&gt;
Additional barter opportunities (more business)for ITEX would result through Western's other subsidiaries, as well as future acquisitions using the ITEX network. 
&lt;br /&gt;
Western anticipated listing on NASDAQ, moving up from the OTCBB, would enhance liquidity and reduce transaction costs for stockholders enterting &#038; exiting the stock.
&lt;br /&gt;
And Western believes their "holding company structure" is the ideal model, and would provide ITEX with the ability to focus on the day-to-day operations, letting Western handle the capital allocation responsibilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Western contends that its holding company structure would allow surplus cash generated (from other subsidiaries &#038; ITEX) to be used in other investments, including the acquisition of other barter companies.<br />
<br />
Western believes additional cost savings  would be attained by eliminating the redundant &#8220;public company&#8221; costs and that such savings would translate into a higher value of Western&#8217;s stock (greater market capitalization).<br />
<br />
Additional barter opportunities (more business)for ITEX would result through Western&#8217;s other subsidiaries, as well as future acquisitions using the ITEX network.<br />
<br />
Western anticipated listing on NASDAQ, moving up from the OTCBB, would enhance liquidity and reduce transaction costs for stockholders enterting &#038; exiting the stock.<br />
<br />
And Western believes their &#8220;holding company structure&#8221; is the ideal model, and would provide ITEX with the ability to focus on the day-to-day operations, letting Western handle the capital allocation responsibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
